

Let’s get the negatives out of the way first. Batch Job (Affinity Photo) vs Image Processor (Adobe Photoshop)Īffinity Photo’s tool doesn’t just copy Photoshop. But… is it just as good, or better than Adobe’s tool? Let’s find out. A quick look at the image below will show you that ‘New Batch Job’ is more like ‘Image Processor’. If you use Adobe Photoshop to process multiple images, you know that converting a large number of files to JPG, TIFF, or PSD formats is probably easier handled by Image Processor (File>Scripts>Image Processor…), rather than the Batch dialog (File>Automate>Batch…). Batch Job (Affinity Photo) vs Batch (Photoshop) Is ‘Batch Job’ A More Powerful ‘Image Processor’?


This is like Photoshop’s Image Processor. In contrast, Affinity Photo only allows you to apply actions while saving new files. Photoshop allows you the flexibility to rename files, apply the commands to multiple folders saving new files, or to apply the actions to the same files and re-save them. While both do allow you to use actions, that’s probably where the resemblance ends. Take a look at the comparison images below. There are some significant differences between Photoshop’s ‘batch’ and Affinity Photo’s ‘batch’ tools. While there are similarities to “Batch”, “Batch Job”, is actually more like Photoshop’s “Image Processor”. Conclusion Batch Job is Not Like Photoshop’s Batch DialogĪffinity Photo is clearly not trying to emulate Adobe Photoshop’s Batch commands.Differences from Photoshop’s Image Processor.9 Steps to Use “New Batch Job…” in Affinity Photo:.Is ‘Batch Job’ A More Powerful ‘Image Processor’?.Batch Job is Not Like Photoshop’s Batch Dialog.
